Is the share price meant to reflect the performance of the company or have I got this wrong?
If it is meant to reflect the performance of the company why is the share price of AIM the same as it was 10 years ago. .028 cents.
Why is it that the cycle of management keep moving through the company, issuing shares, performance rights, and then move on.
A new lot then comes in, continues to get paid fat salaries from the shareholders coffers, promises the earth and they then move on.
Whose the bunny?
I know what it is, my timeframe of 10 years is not long enough. But how come there are over 1 bilion shares on offer now. Havent they been issuing those shares to raise capital so that a viable project could be completed. Ah, my impatience again. 10 years is not long enough and market conditions. But arent they the experts at understanding market conditions. They run the mining company - not me. I give them my money so they can build the project, then they make money and so do I. But why do they just keep taking it. Oh I understand, 10 years is not long enough and market conditions.
But arent they the experts?
Just a thought.
AIM Price at posting:
0.0¢ Sentiment: LT Buy Disclosure: Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)