We appreciate your anecdotes but, once again, you've followed up...

We appreciate your anecdotes but, once again, you've followed up with a thinly veiled attempt at discrediting the tech.

You're giving credence to the fact that the NDIS sets a low benchmark when it comes to effectiveness, and pointing out that scams still sell (Your second point is also incorrect according to the research conducted by AAT). You're posing an argument with the prior assumption that the technology is ineffectual. That's called begging the question. It's an assumption, and quite likely an incorrect one. You can say that you don't think something works, but that doesn't make it true.