The Procter & Gamble relationship has yielded much less revenue than shareholders expected it to yield since the launch of the first OBJ-inspired product in 2014 (the SK-II magnetic wand). After almost 4 years, 4 products, and over 1,000,000 product sales, the revenue derived from this relationship is commercially trivial for an ASX-listed company. Can the Board please explain why shareholders expectations have not been met in this regard? Are the revenues derived from the P&G relationship going to get any better?
Questions for 5 April Investor Call, page-29
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 150 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add WFL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.478M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
| WFL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable