This may be a good place to accumulate relevant questions for the next Webinar.
I will start, with comment, and question.
Comment. All of our partnering since the beginning has failed to measure the outstanding issues that would provide a succession of events to achieve the end state of being a revenue earner with our technology. Be it from either the partner, or ourselves own readiness.
Question. When identifying a new partnering relationship, what is the scrutiny that occurs, to discern between those who can, and those who will simply regurgitate in their own troubles endlessly. ?
We want to partner, where we can measure success, and hold them accountable to being ineffectual.
And prudently we want to dismiss at the outset, any the Tyre kickers, from the really committed.
Comment. The market believes to an extent that we are getting closer to revenues, as demonstrated by the buyers and sp movement several pips higher. However it is constantly bludgeoned by selling, from either the note holder or even Nick himself in recent times. This erodes any confidence of buyers to put their necks out of the trenches to be shot off again.
Question. This must stop. What is the company doing, to actively find a strategic investor who will buy and hold and escrow, rather than flip on market. ? Surely there are large pockets in the world who believe that this can deliver ? What about the partners themselves ? Perhaps if they are serious then they should also be cornerstone investors as well.?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Questions for Next Webinar
This may be a good place to accumulate relevant questions for...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 114 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)