The difference seems to be that AC8 and CAN are able to secure tens of millions of dollars in funding through capital raising with absolute ease at a decent price. At this point, QBL’s sp is under half of the proposed capital raise price. Revenue doesn’t matter to CAN when they are about to fit out a 100million dollar facility. Not talking these company’s up, just stating the absolute obvious.
Now, this is where revenue comes into play for QBL, cause that’s about all they’ve got that can bring this back. If they produce some strong revenue, give us harvest details and revenue projections for the upcoming harvest and growth potential from larger crops down the track, they could get a decent capital raise no problems at all. That’s the golden question though, are we going to these announcements we have been chasing for so long now?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CGB
- Questions for QBL - July 2018
Questions for QBL - July 2018, page-44
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 8 more messages in this thread...
This thread is closed.
You may not reply to this discussion at this time.
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CGB (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online