i thought he made some good points regarding the distribution of temperature stations over time and the resulting accuracy that is the end result. Im not sure that he should be dismissed with such arrogance and rudeness and im sure that someone of his background would have no problem with people debating his position in a mature fashion.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- Questions remain for the AGW alarmists
Questions remain for the AGW alarmists, page-38
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 41 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
FWD
Queensland's housing crisis an opportunity for ASX builder Fleetwood – and taxpayer cash a safe harbour from the storm
RNU
Renascor wins a funding boost given it wants to produce a critical mineral – but $5M award pales in comparison to some