He made many good points GM, but our rabid left NEVER address...

He made many good points GM, but our rabid left NEVER address what is said, they prefer character assassination.

And since when has a scientist not been qualified to speak on science? A man with decades of experience in the science world can read on another topic he/she has not explored in depth before, apply knowledge gathered over decades and see errors that a new graduate would never have seen. That is how peer review is supposed to work, not pal review.