He made many good points GM, but our rabid left NEVER address what is said, they prefer character assassination.
And since when has a scientist not been qualified to speak on science? A man with decades of experience in the science world can read on another topic he/she has not explored in depth before, apply knowledge gathered over decades and see errors that a new graduate would never have seen. That is how peer review is supposed to work, not pal review.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- Questions remain for the AGW alarmists
He made many good points GM, but our rabid left NEVER address...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 38 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)