Obviously the original reply was not well accepted and maybe had some noses out of joint
NVM
The pittance I hold in GPP has permitted me to still pressure management of their shortcomings as a shareholder
,
something that WFE shareholders don't seem to keen to do
, but end of the day I could always choose to sell - how is trading WFE going for you?
Fortunately, like
@The Avenger
I put money into goldies like SAR / Utilities / O & G or dividend paying blue chip stocks.
re: "
So as for the matters regarding ASX rules…………. I’m saying WFE lawyers would have a handle on it."
Have they really? How many times has the company submitted an in-principle advice application again?
Wouldn't be the same lawyers that ummmm said that the B category licence would be issued within the next 6 weeks in February!
re: "The company surely wants a positive in place before any AGM date is set."
That may be the case, but it is totally irrelevant, WFE regardless of
what they may want
are bound by (in this instance) the regulations of the Corporations Act, pretty simple and clear cut, the company is bound to call an AGM, 5 months after the end of the financial year and not when they feel like it or get some positive announcement out.
What "excuse" can you offer for the company not releasing the 1/2 yearly (to the 31st December 2018) audited accounts, I have read the company's so called reason, ("
The delay in releasing the half yearly has been the necessary sign offs and wording in the proposed DRC acquisitions")
to which on the 19th September in the reply email from Brewer to
@beisha
they were to be released shortly.
Oh wait, would the same lawyers be working on these vital documents as well? or
maybe the company is waiting on some other positive
before they release them?
Or maybe they should get other lawyers to proof read the documents before WFE's lawyers submit them?
cheers
