agreed!
its like this...you can't be open to the possibility and indeed often remind the whole world that sgh may have cooked/misrepresent their books (as some of the class actions suggest - even though asics checked it twice now) and then flip it and not be also open to the idea that the guys at quindell did something similar. All of it can happen is a possibility, one party did it but not the other or none of them did so...
you can have thorough due diligence and a thousand lawyers...does not matter if you're relying on something misrepresented/fraudulent. just wondering if wilfully withholding a sensitive document and possibly saying nothing amounts to misrepresentation/fraud or were they suppose to get that document...this drama gets exciting everyday.
above is all my opinion.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Quindell's buyers sue to reclaim every penny spent
agreed! its like this...you can't be open to the possibility and...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 116 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SGH (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online