The timing and speed of the distribution suggest to me that the directors at Quindell knows fraudulent is involve to a certain extend.. should not be too hard for Slaters to prove this to the court.
Now the question is: if institutional investors receives money obtained fraudulently, can it be claws back?
How many institutional investors was in Quindells' share registry?
Quindell's buyers sue to reclaim every penny spent, page-16
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 111 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)