yes agreed - it was just a smart ar%s comment...my point was...

yes agreed - it was just a smart ar%s comment...my point was bears on the sgh forum have been quick to point about the bad points of an 'investment' (yes I put inverted commas to be neutral to both bears and bulls - don't come back at me with 'sgh is not an investment' arguments..this and that)...its easy to point out a company thats bad...but theres value in everything...1) risk and reward; 2) you're in a bad investment...do you cry and exit or do you average cost down???

if a company is good quality..cheap valuation - easy right? you buy...if its poor quality, expensive valus...easy again...you sell...if its poor quality, cheap valuation - what do you do? which one is sgh? poor quality, expensive valn? or poor quality, cheap valns? of course you average cost down the latter but not the former...hence why these forums have been meaningless dribble for a while...

onwards to the results...