Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

killing animals for food is not the same as killing them for fun...

First 29 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
busybee

935 Posts.

2

30/07/15

15:18

Post #: 15722147
Share

Originally posted by jlov3 ↑

I don't agree with killing the lion but he went through the correct channels, paid the money and did the deed. Animals are animals and we should not care for one more than an other simply because we think it's majestic, beautiful, "king of the jungle" or more important. That lion was 13 and wouldn't last much longer in the wild. He would have been challenged by a male and fought to the death or close to it. Nature is extremely cruel especially in the world of the lion but most of the nature documentaries filter all of that out now.
That lion died for $50k, how much did you pay for that intensively farmed chicken, pig or fish? How about that kangaroo in the pet food?

Expand

killing animals for food is not the same as killing them for fun
this poor excuse of a human apparently shoots anything that moves in the wild just for his thrills, he's been in trouble with the law before
I hope his life is made a misery,he's already in hiding fearing for his life
3 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

With financials holding the fort, materials must step up with some heavy lifting to stimulate stocks

Plagues precede widespread power shifts. We’re living in one – and minerals are at the fore

FHE

Frontier Energy achieves key milestone for Waroona energy project

SBW

Shekel Brainweigh CEO Nir Leshem weighs in on AI adoption ahead of FY25

RDN

If you thought lithium was dead, think again. The Pilbara will be central to the next upswing

There are more pages in this discussion • 41 more messages in this thread...

First 29 Last

SPONSORED BY