- Below is a part of a RAC post:
- Our conviction around the potential of the product is not what will likely send this to the moon. Nor will we find moon size buyers on reddit or recruiting on other threads (or bagging other biotechs) - to me, this cheapens and throws a shade over RAC. Industry funds or bigger funds will decide when we really moon.
Good evening
@Dr TFirst of all, many thanks for your big warm welcome Dr.T !
I am a pensioner age newbie who have started putting all my available resources to Aussie biotech startups since August last year.
Aim: to save lives+support Aussie biotechs.
My initial portfolio was comprised of Imugene and 6 others but Rac wasn’t in my portfolio partly I was new and partly bcos I tried to avoid chemo based biotec until after I finally managed to watch your videos of your last two AGMs. I was “convinced” that equating chemo to all negativeness is perhaps wrong! So I bought @3 soon afterwards and prepared to hold LT as Imugene and other biotechs.
However, I sold all Rac yesterday after due consideration when a popular Rac poster asked/queried in an almost slanderous manner and started challenging the ethics of some Imugene associated/world renowned scientists.
This poster claimed that he had to post at Imugene thread bcos Leslie/CEO failed to give him her an email address to post a super long list of technical questions which most of us aren’t trained to comprehend.
My apologies to that that RAC poster if indeed he is not a down ramper or troll.
There is enough room for different science and technology to save lives.
Good to all need patients/families, all biotech startups.
Looking forward to be a LTSH of Rac one day soon.
God bless
