radioactive sbt, page-7

JoeIP: Your post just shows that you don't have any idea about radioactivity, and presumably science in general.

As remirez said, bananas are radioactive. You are radioactive. Every living thing is radioactive, every thing which has ever lived on this planet has been radioactive, and yes, that includes plants and dinosaurs and things which lived millions of years before the first human took breath.

The tuna living out in the open ocean are cleaner than what Cleanseas can produce off the SA coast. The increased levels of radioactivity are meaningless in terms of quality. The only negative they have is in the minds of the uninformed/unintelligent.

Put it this way; if you're worried about the tuna being 'radioactive' because they are 10x more radioactive than normal, then eating one of those tuna will give you 10x the radioactive harm of one normal tuna. So, if you ate 10 normal tuna you'd get the same amount of radiation damage. How much radiation damage do you usually get when you eat tuna? None. How much is 10x nothing? Still nothing.

Now let's look at what actually is important in terms of tuna quality. Things like heavy metals and other pollutants. These actually do affect the quality of the fish and can have damaging effects to your body if you eat them. Looking at these relevant pollutants, where do you think you'll get more of them? In the middle of the open ocean, or off the SA coastline in waters closer to mining, manufacturing and city runoff etc.?

...and as usual, the uninformed will tell the informed to get real. And almost as laughably, you're still calling CSS a buy! Best of luck with your CSS stock!