When the algorithm misdiagnoses, it stores the sound signature and adds it to its data recognition base. The mere fact that the % correct diagnosis of children cleared by GP's significantly increased can only be presented as proof. Do you consider this to be some fluke? I can tell you, as someone that has studied advanced statistics, the sample sizes are more than large enough to prove the algorithm had improved between samples.
- Forums
- Charts
- RAP charting
When the algorithm misdiagnoses, it stores the sound signature...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5,118 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add RAP (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
20.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $176.2M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
RAP (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable