I have similar concerns. It's really hard to read this at...

I have similar concerns. It's really hard to read this at the moment.

The only real geo insights we have are from a thesis extract published a while ago suggesting the ground has some ionic adsorption clay 'qualities' but doesn't meet the definition for IAC. The hits, although shallow, also seem too deep and high grade compared to other IAC deposits.

It really does sound like something in-between that's not really an IAC deposit. On the other hand the grades and tonnage might be enough that's it's viable anyway once a suitable recovery method can be found?

Dark horse at the moment.