rationalist view on the carbon tax, page-3

  1. 13,445 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1
    "If you trust the climate scientists then you need to impose a cap on carbon."

    Also apart from the below can I edit the word carbon ( a solid) to the gaseous carbon dioxide is every single time to simply a low class scammers ploy every time it is used abbreviated.


    Precisely the point, the MAJORITY see's them and rightly so as nothing higher than shaman with all the political voice.

    if some wacko playing with the pixies down to back yard came up to the house and told you you needed to change the way you did EVERYTHING because of a round table discussion he did with those elitist pixies.....would you comply? at what level would you comply?

    If the shaman came up and added threats and consequences to their ruling in that you might more easily comply would you be more or less compelled to comply....even meekly as hoped?

    For one the just believe today after every single research point of AGW science has already been in rolling sense smashed to smithereens in the real cognitive scientific world ever since 1998.......one must contend today it is ALL about a lack of human character/and conscience..... and the money.

    If one looks into this science all the while using their brains executive function where is the evidence over say any other wacko applied sciences like creationism or homeopathy, one as a matter of personal character and in the protection of others must flatly refuse to comply with any such schizophrenia driven ideology's..... just because they have the power to force their wacko ideology's abusively upon every single individual never means they had the right.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.