Just looked at that ABC article and one would suggest a customer surcharge fee for using BNPL services would impact APT more so than it would Zip. This is considering that APT is drawing near 80% of their revenues from merchants, as opposed to Zip only portioning 38% of revenue being generated from merchants.
The COGS for a product paid for via APT is obviously higher than COGS for the same product bought with Zip. So it'd make sense as a retailer to slug a higher surcharge on someone paying with APT at the checkout, if and wheb they will be allowed to do so.
Just looked at that ABC article and one would suggest a customer...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add ZIP (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.41 |
Change
0.060(4.44%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.574B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.38 | $1.43 | $1.37 | $12.27M | 8.733M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 23 | 59590 | $1.41 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.41 | 74403 | 28 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 14.08pm 25/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ZIP (ASX) Chart |