This thread seems to have been constructed upon a simple error, which should not have happened. A bailout requires injections of capital while the provision of emergency liquidity does not. The issue was all about some funds faced with unexpected withdrawals coming to require extra cash in the form of loans
You don't need to be an expert in order to understand that super funds do have liquidity provisions based on estimates about future receipts and payments to their members in conformity with existing superannuation legislation and their governing rules and if unexpectedly through government decision those estimates turn out to be insufficient then extra liquidity maybe needed in order to avoid a disorganized liquidation of assets.
