I've seen this come up a few times. What is your logic behind this? You're essentially saying FAR would offload their "company-making" discovery(s) and opt to sail off, hoping to high-heaven that they'll find something similar again?
I can't rationalise this in any way. If someone wants to buy the lease, they'll have to TO FAR
I've seen this come up a few times. What is your logic behind...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 16 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add FAR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
50.0¢ |
Change
-0.015(2.91%) |
Mkt cap ! $46.20M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 52.5¢ | 52.5¢ | 50.0¢ | $45.91K | 88.73K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 5993 | 50.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 50.5¢ | 5982 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.08pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| FAR (ASX) Chart |