Hi Akita
Thank you for sharing your thoughts and links in this mostly one-sided ‘debate’ on the merger proposal and - more importantly - the value ration of 58% to 42% at which it was set .
However in regards the ore body comparisons have you seen Troy’s posts of last weekend?
FYI weeks ago - back in early October Hawk posted (his thoughts are in
bold to a post I had made
[ref]
… not so much kool aid in those days although going for most money in the short term was more of an agenda, even back then, than solid research
- eg the argument RCF was an evil predator (a view that was strong in these forums at the time, although noone has ever given a
valid case for why it should have agreed to the merger proposal on terms which make it the ‘biggest loser’ financially.)
cheers