From the way this thread leans there seems to be agreement that...

From the way this thread leans there seems to be agreement that a single company would be better. There is some dissent about the price.
What if the deal was going the other way and AVL shareholders were being offered 1 TMT for every 12 AVL they held. I think there would be equal dissent on the AVL side
I think we are arguing about a few cents which we have lost due to dissent in the ranks. If it wasn't for the dissenters and we all embraced the "merger" our share price would still be above 30c.
Sure there are a lot of operational questions to ask. I think we would be better served asking management to be a bit more open about our future direction. Over the years HC has fostered a rivalry between the two companies. but there has always been a few of us on both sides that have beloved in ONE ORE BODY ONE COMPANY.