so do we assume then that e69/2108 and e69/2109:
1. have had "friendly" plaints put on them so that rds does not have to spend money;
2. have had "friendly" plaints put on them as rds is dropping the ground and the plainter will not have to spend money; or
3. have genuinely been plainted due to lack of spend by rds and rds will either win or lose the case.
RDS - Annual report:, page-13
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 15 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add RDS (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.4¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $3.701M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.4¢ | 0.4¢ | 0.4¢ | $12.4K | 3.1M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | 12389445 | 0.4¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5¢ | 3700000 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 16/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| RDS (ASX) Chart |