A lot of counting your chickens before they hatch going on here, holders better be prepared for a significant fall if the upcoming results aren't good.
* Changing the deadline for reporting results twice without giving a reason is suspicious.
* Placing your main project as the 3rd headline in the quarterly is suspicious.
* The following wording is usually padding to try soften the blow of already known poor results:
"As the area has never been drilled before, this initial drill program over one part of the prospective area, serves as a crucial data feed to understand the dip, plunge, extent and any structural controls of the pegmatites at depth."
Some points to think about for those with the ability to check their ego/bias.
Re rate happening, page-2781
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1,443 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
