And that is something that has puzzled me salt, there was no lab...

And that is something that has puzzled me salt, there was no lab on site so who knows how often tailing samples where taken and how accurate they would be at any rate.. How was 4.12 g/t ever arrived at? An uninformed stab in the dark would be my guess....

G'Day Jim -Its a bit peculiar your statement ?
MGT -Stated in a Market update that the mean average was 4.12 g p/t & hence
they were concerned enough to call in consulting experts -SRK.-Fact

So do you think MGT was misinforming the market & called in consulting experts
because of a stab in the dark ?- Don't think thats even remotely plausible .

Standard Operating procedure is to check tailing regularity during operations
especially during commissioning periods .

When out of spec -gold confirmed going to tailings alterations or plant shut down
until remedy solution is implemented is normal.

Small routine samples sent off to lab for fire assay would be perfectly
normal -they are low cost accurate very quick to process even in external labs,
and are essential, have no doubt previous MGT new exactly what they were
loosing to tailing when they called in consulting experts.

Does the figure 4.12 grams per tonne sound like a stab in the dark number-
NO -its an exact number .
salt