"admit temperature has not risen for 10 years as "real" climate scientists have admitted"
Ok so the "real" scientists have "admitted" that the temperature has not risen. You seem to agree with them in that case, and consider them to be "real" scientists because it appears to support the Skeptic case. So why disagree with the rest of their theory that the lack of rise was caused by external effects that are not relevant to the central idea of AGW?
