They’ll deflect, as they’ve continually done.
What he’s trying to portray as a ‘fact’ is his claim that next quarter the company will have to pay the Taurus debt due for that period but that the company’s sales will not have generated enough profit to cover that payment - that’s the crux of his argument, which he is claiming is an apparent fact.
And since he’s happy to mention maths…surely he can post his maths workings (just like you have) that proves his ‘fact’.
*Spoiler alert - he can’t/won’t.
Receivers Playbook, page-31
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 23 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
