recency effect - a case study, page-5

Wow Camden
Haha
In effort to hold your worshippers loyalty you have stooped to a new level of Low!! IMO
Points raised relate to dates posted, a rehash now is so distant to be insignificant. Interesting that you have not used any of my more recent posts indicating I see a turn in price also, very selective and narrow minded one feels!!

Fact1...A majority of these posts belong to me!!

Fact2... The price action of QBE at the time of POST...vindicated points made, as such a trader behaves!!

Fact3... Management actions indeed have been flat at best!! Wow they even bought more of the falling knife as it fell and continues to do after they bought!!

Fact4... If you profile my style of trading the market you would know that points related to the DAY on the DAY. U raise these points NOW Why because QBE has turned Positive AT LAST!! I should i shleve this post ready to rlease it when/if QBE takes another dive.
As I guarantee U 100% it will, when well I wish I knew then id post date your post 4 U as well as short QBE to make a Squillion!!
As I have continuiuosly stated (not that U appear to have the ability to listen, example being Calvo's response to yours on indepth fundamental issues).

Now an interesting crossroad has come upon us. I believe as do all the long term holders/dreamers on here that QBE has more energy northwards. However Calvo (a way sharper tool than myself or ANYONE else on this thread) says its overbought so im watching with interest, as I dont hold so it really doesnt concern me, however another sharp shooter named Voltaire says as QBE goes so does the rest of the market (however sometimes in a delayed fashion)

Cam U want to address peoples posts have the Balls to list there names so that they may readdress you individually

Also
Camd Wrote
Notice how the tone of the commentrary reflects the prevailing share price, i.e., share price falling = "negative "further downside" tone, while share price rising = "positive tone and "there's further upside" (even if the share price is now rising from a hihger "(Cams mispelling not mine)" level than when it was argued to have downside:

The above is simply written off as traders expression as movement confirms its direction. Obviously bringing it up here merely confirms your lack of trading skills or knowledge yet you fail to acknowledge that in yourself,instead using it as a way try find weakness in other posters, look inside to really be great Cam is my advice.
But long term holders never do they look for the eventual confirmation that they were right conecting that onto the opposing posters of the time (ignoring the pastness in the Date of Post) in attempt to make them the Yang (black or wrong in the current time). Good luck with your voyage of tainted sunglass explorations, giggle giggle

Most disappointed reader

Ps here is a real challenge ask someone who shorted QBE how they fared for the last almost Year as QBE has gone from $25.60 1st Jan 2010 high to a low of $16.09 . A share price loss of how much %?????

37% yes thats right 37% LOSS i dont think I would be posting with such vigour if i was you instead perhaps id look for my humble hat and ask a Sharp Trader who Shorts the stocks/market for some advice. 37% Cam your a bold 1 to be posting this tripe IMO on above facts.
Even at Fridays closing price its a wopping 27% LOSS . Wow plenty of reasons to be getting excited NOT
BDZ ;))
The Happy to Direct Posts Directly as those I disagree with Kinda Guy