recent volume?, page-76

1. I can assure you - I have lost a LOT less on Carnegie than most 'long term share holders'. In fact, so little have a lost that it would barely buy a decent bottle of Vodka.
2. I did NOT abuse you, but I did highlight that you were effectively appealing for contributors here to mount a Gamestop-type approach to this stock! That deserved to be called out.
3. When a stock has lost 98% of its value over 10 years you HAVE LOST money whether you sell or not. Right now - if you had put say $20k into this over time, you could only move it all at 0.001/share and it would yield you a couple of hundred dollars.

I have spend a small amount of time trying to highlight the whoaful performance (ASX leading in a bad way) of this company. Performance is evidence and it is undeniable that they have sold ANYTHING except a little bit of energy to DoD for a solar farm (no WAVE in there).

Sure - do your best to trade it but you've only yourselves to blame. In my opinion, if I held now, I feel the best move would be to sell it up, move on, and forget it. There are around 2000 better prospects on the ASX right now.