No wishful thinking on my part and not double counting !!
It clearly states the 7.8c (Not 7.3c) is a non recourse loan over an Australian held asset (Nothing to do with the Japanese/O`Rorke settlement)
"Trinity notes that an Australian property asset is financed by limited recourse debt"
Want to try your sums again ?
No wishful thinking on my part and not double counting !!It...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)