REE prices., page-102

Then you would know that HC owes no duty to a subscriber of research and should not respond to subscriber complaints.

The owner of the information, usually the broker, may complain if s/he does not want the exposure. Even when brokers register a complaint the commercial consequences of intermittent disclosure is minimal and damages are inconceivable.


Subscribers who complain because another subscriber shares some info are hard to understand. Do they think their research or ability to invest is diminished because someone else reads something they have paid for. the reality is that research exposed to debate on HC is generally improved. These whining subscribers might do better if they kept quite and read the debate.

As a subscriber is in not my right to share some information from my paid newsletter with HC readers or elsewhere in order to get a second opinion? Attribution would be appropriate but prohibition of sharing is not.

The market equivalent to the politics of envy.