''Religious belief/faith is intrinsically ridiculous, then why do you spend so much of your valuable time in here?''
Why? Perhaps being an adversary to the absurd is a form of public service. What if nobody spoke out against Superstition? What if anything that anyone happened to believe, no matter how absurd, was never questioned? Everything that anyone claims to be true being accepted as true? Now that would really be absurd.
''And you might have noticed that politics, sport, skin colour, in fact pretty much anything that humans do eventually causes trouble, division and conflict, even scientific groups have been in conflict. This world was built by conflict. Almost every nation was forged in conflict. We're a conflicted animal.''
Shouldn't all of these things be questioned? Shouldn't they be discussed? Shouldn't false assumptions and beliefs be publicly exposed?
- Forums
- Philosophy & Religion
- religion vs Philosophy
religion vs Philosophy, page-8
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
P.HOTC
HotCopper
Frazer Bourchier, Director, President and CEO
Frazer Bourchier
Director, President and CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online