Yeah, meh, whatever. It's like AFAICT ALL cosmology is wild speculation anyway and the deciding factors always seems to come down to your apriori beliefs. As with all things where we don't have a lot of real evidence either way. So inverse singularities are just as plausible that clashing branes or fluctuating quanta and uncaused big bangs etc. Nice to see someone doing some work outside of the narrow box of humanist cosmology I guess. :)
