You raise the point about what “facts” the AFR has written about, but IMO the sensationalist style of writing that also needs consideration by a reader before reaching conclusions.
BirdoFPrey wrote an interesting analysis of what the facts/evidence are that have been provided in the last article see:
https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/another-afr-article.4039942/page-357?post_id=31496173#.Wpsvq2LZWEc
IMO RE had to go before this latest article, and I ask for ideas about who might replace him? If what was said about him on Friday is untrue the lawsuit against AFR will probably be settled out of court but involve a very public apology. If its true, IMO he has no place in a public company.
As for the rest of last Friday’s piece, was there anything in it that is material and not known prior thru the BIG ASX response letters?
Lumpy
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Relist -When??
You raise the point about what “facts” the AFR has written...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 46 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add BIG (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online