Come on Muss. I predicted that you would take that path and proactively covered those points in my previous post. Rather than address what has already been said you just trot out the obvious but flawed argument of "they didn't bid during administration therefore they wouldn't have bid during liquidation either" without bothing to address the flaws in it that have already been pointed out. Makes your response look pre-canned.
PS. When you say one thing which is clearly misleading, the process of clarifying the facts isn't usually considered a "semantic play".
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?