Aptayl
ASIC should be involved because the Coy alledgely took Mokbels drug money. You would think forensic accountants would be looking into the trading or financing. That is aserious Federal Offence.
Does anyone know the Money Laundering Act and how that would apply to third party recipients like STI as they got money from a broker. How do we know that broker used Mokbels money with STI. Surely STI's agreements with financiers would be asking the question " Does this money comply under the Money Laundering Act".
This has been swept under the carpet and explains why the fight against drugs is failing dismly.
I seriousily doubt whether the HDA has got anywhere.
Immoxenal must be coming up in the news somewhere.
What happened to Stanimate and Stirling South Africa?
Its very ordinary the way Administrators go about there business. Directors are under the microscope from ASX, ASIC and s/h with updates BUT we get secondhand news from newspapers or google searchs when under Administration.
T1
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- STI
- relisting
relisting, page-12
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 28 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add STI (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
EQN
EQUINOX RESOURCES LIMITED.
Zac Komur, MD & CEO
Zac Komur
MD & CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online