STI 0.00% 0.2¢ stirling products limited

AptaylASIC should be involved because the Coy alledgely took...

  1. 1,398 Posts.
    Aptayl

    ASIC should be involved because the Coy alledgely took Mokbels drug money. You would think forensic accountants would be looking into the trading or financing. That is aserious Federal Offence.

    Does anyone know the Money Laundering Act and how that would apply to third party recipients like STI as they got money from a broker. How do we know that broker used Mokbels money with STI. Surely STI's agreements with financiers would be asking the question " Does this money comply under the Money Laundering Act".

    This has been swept under the carpet and explains why the fight against drugs is failing dismly.

    I seriousily doubt whether the HDA has got anywhere.

    Immoxenal must be coming up in the news somewhere.

    What happened to Stanimate and Stirling South Africa?

    Its very ordinary the way Administrators go about there business. Directors are under the microscope from ASX, ASIC and s/h with updates BUT we get secondhand news from newspapers or google searchs when under Administration.

    T1
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add STI (ASX) to my watchlist

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.