yep that’s not how it works, why would someone buy a token that has debt in a company as the underlying purpose of the token? Then someone would just sell that token (being debt) to someone else?
Why would anyone buy a token with the underlying purpose of a firm issuing it would be to buy back existing shares? That is just a pyramid scheme in practice
Wouldn’t make any sense.
They’re using it as a means of a forward contract if there is any comparison to be made. These tokens, much like contracts can then be traded at a price and instead of a set delivery date like contracts, the idea is that they can approach Renergen with a token and are then entitled to x amount of helium based off initial purchase of tokens to begin with.
It is not a workaround for capital raise like the way I think you’re perceiving it to be.
Another thing to think about and I don’t know what the answer is.
how does this impact WACC? How do you go about calculating it.
major grey area.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- RENERGEN ROAD TO REVENUE
yep that’s not how it works, why would someone buy a token that...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add RLT (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
71.5¢ |
Change
0.005(0.70%) |
Mkt cap ! $21.68M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
71.5¢ | 72.5¢ | 71.0¢ | $30.69K | 42.83K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 2500 | 71.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
73.0¢ | 293 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 2500 | 0.710 |
3 | 60663 | 0.700 |
1 | 5000 | 0.660 |
1 | 20000 | 0.650 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.730 | 293 | 1 |
0.745 | 5000 | 2 |
0.755 | 8600 | 1 |
0.760 | 13181 | 2 |
0.770 | 2500 | 1 |
Last trade - 15.48pm 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
RLT (ASX) Chart |