Renewable Hydrogen, page-34

Thats not a hydrogen engine, hydrogen gas propellant, hydrogen energy source nor a hydrogen fuel cell even.
Its an electric car with an LNG taxi fuel cell. The hydrogen is in the LNG fuel so its dirty fossil fuel like the taxis on the road but good marketing.

A true hydrogen power and energy is like that in the Hindenburg or the Challenger Space Shuttle using liquid hydrogen as THE energy source & THE fuel of the engine like in the rockets used.

SO none of this is hydrogen power or even a hydrogen based battery, the electricity is stored in a battery and the hydrogen used from LNG.

So a Claytons hydrogen EV basically.
So much for hydrogen energy vision. Waste of money and time.
A car that runs on air, needs a massive catalytic converter, many days of air conversion, and a true rocket engine using massive liquid hydrogen combustion tanks, can drive it to the moon with that amount of explosive power is fully sealed, may happen in 100 years if they can build a giga catalytic converter without platinum/nickel that doesnt weigh 10T with smaller hydrogen powered rocket engines that dont expode and weight less than 100T each.
Needs 20 years of development & $5B R&D investment to get off the ground if it ever does.

Musk & Tesla have got it right hence the MC of US$890B & now him as the worlds richest man.
EV & NCM 811 battery will dominate the next 30 years.

Sure lets drive to the moon.
Honey take the H bomb to the shops thanks!
Furphy.