Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Renewables serious limitations, page-53

First 53 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
acorn

39,009 Posts.

4

12/11/24

21:39

Post #: 76573984
Share

Originally posted by pintohoo: ↑

''It certainly is impossible for nuclear to fill the gap left by the demise of coal plants.''

'how' - you tell me how ----------- you lay out a timeline that gets nuclear on the ground by 2035 ---------- it's got to be practical and doable

bullet point - point by point ----------------- you do that and if it's sensible - I'll agree with you ----------- but, it's got to be doable.

Expand

The hc nuclear shills are FOS.

No numbers. No facts . No evidence . No proof .

Ever.

They are lying grubs.
1 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

PAR

Paradigm Biopharmaceuticals makes key acquisition moving into FY26

BPH

Australia’s gas crisis is here – and dying coal plants aren’t helping

NATO’s 5% target: Why Almonty Industries’ mega mine and NASDAQ listing are a perfect fit for investors

SRL

Sunrise pops on top scandium hits NSW explorer will now use for 'multi-decade' plan

Week 26 Wrap: Renewable gas fantasies; RBA July cut hope builds; copper's August peak?

HotCopper Highlights Week 26: Droneshield 2.0; Trigg re-jig & Virgin

MVF

Monash IVF shares cater 25% – Disaster or deep-value play?

OCC

Orthocell sees 4% jump as Remplir used in first US surgery. But is that low?

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 015 – Yeah, we're thinking the IPO market is back

RMX

Red Mountain: Chip samples point to 'large orogenic antimony mineral system' at Oaky Creek

First 53 Last

SPONSORED BY