These repayments still bother me.
If I have a company that sells toilet paper and somebody else give me 100 bugs per role. I then go and send out my quarterly statement to my investors showing a nice little profit. But afterwards that somebody comes back and want 99 bugs per role back because the price was obviously not quite right. Fair enough ... I obviously have to pay back the difference ..... if I can. If I can't I go bust.
That quarterly statement that I issued is actually correct because I had received the 100 bugs per role, knowing though that I will eventually have to pay something back though, but I don't need to tell that to my investors.
Isn't that what MRX just did?
Maybe I just live a bit behind the moon and I am obviously a bit naive but if this 'accounting b..llsh..t' is legal, then is there somebody out there who'd fancy setting up a toilet paper business. But don't tell anybody ... we are going to make that 1000 bugs per role .. that will get the share price up.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MRX
- repayments
repayments
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 8 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MRX (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
TON
TRITON MINERALS LTD
Adrian Costello, Executive Director
Adrian Costello
Executive Director
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online