So, it's economics vs politics for you. And you see economics winning. Ok, gotcha.
But, the green voting block doesn't care about the economics, nor does the labour far-left. They fanatically want the ban remaining in place. No?
Now, if we accept that Roger needs these two voting blocks to win 2025, then we must accept that he needs to make a deal with them. Right? Or, is my logic flawed?
So, in conclusion...doesn't cynical politics always win in the end? Doesn't history prove that.
Roger would sacrfice the uranium mining sector, to ensure election victory in 2025, no?
Is my logic flawed?
Or, maybe you're implying that he'll break his deal with the greens & the leftwing of his own party. That once elected, he'll stab them in the back? Is that what you mean?
Expand
(20min delay)