reply by damian, page-4

According to Biota

This component of the BARDA funded contract is not significant.

The Vic Govt funding on its own is not significant.

If you compare them to quarterly royalties from GSK, they are more significant.

Biota management like to throw their weight around like they are a big player and are all high and mighty. When the shareprice doesn't reflect all this, they blame external factors.

All I have ever got from them (and I promise you I have spent countless hours of MY valuable time trying to help) is this attitude and whenever there is a problem, its always due to some factor that is out of their control.

How patronising they are. As Kangaroo said, these pieces of news are material (whatever value they are worth and could impact on an investor decision to buy or sell).

How dare they decide what is and is not significant when they are pleading to be taken seriously by the Australian investment community!

I am fuming!