Reply from Dr Matthew Painter re the PFS, page-76

Prawn man, thanks.

I thought I deserved an award for getting you and a thread adversary to "Like" the same post. The recent debate on the ARL PFS got a little heated, but the fact is the darned thing was very difficult to understand.

Anyway the people posting here seem objective, and interested in reasoned debate even though ultimately they may differ in opinion even after everything is thrashed out to get at such facts as are available.

So far I see no reason not to accept people's posts as they are written, nor do I see reasons to doubt anyone's motives. Motives are motives. Facts are facts.

I have stated I think actual timely production is very important. What I am driving at, is that I appreciate your reference to HIG, and do have any suspicions about your motives.

Of course I will check it and make my own conclusions.

I would never do anything just based on a recommendation...from you, a newsletter writer, advisors, or anybody.
I take recommendations as leads to be investigated.

DYOR, natch.