It does make sense we will be taken over. There must be plenty of companies who can't stand the idea of us having a ten or twenty bagger, so it stands to reason somebody will offer us a puny 3 bag price and grab all the more substantial remaining upside we should have had.
I wonder if one of the reasons for our low share price is people switching out into SDL, hoping to bag a re-rating on that and then to come back here and repeat (I must admit I have given it some thought, but I am not going to bother). Fingers crossed for Tony Abbott to win and repeal that mineral resource rent tax: the last thing we want is a profit related tax - as a low cost producer we would be worse off than from paying a flat mining royalty.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- reported short sales
It does make sense we will be taken over. There must be plenty...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 93 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
MND
Monadelphous inks $200M contract with Woodside to help build Pluto LNG – but will it make Scarborough cheaper?
NVA
Nova locks in NASDAQ US market listing at a value of only US$3.3M as ASX gets quieter and quieter
Add RHK (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
80.0¢ |
Change
-0.005(0.62%) |
Mkt cap ! $159.8M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
80.0¢ | 80.0¢ | 80.0¢ | $214 | 267 |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 5181 | 76.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
79.5¢ | 2733 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 5181 | 0.765 |
1 | 16200 | 0.760 |
1 | 5538 | 0.740 |
1 | 1309 | 0.700 |
1 | 7246 | 0.690 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.795 | 2733 | 1 |
0.865 | 9063 | 1 |
0.870 | 3999 | 1 |
0.880 | 10355 | 1 |
0.890 | 2368 | 1 |
Last trade - 10.06am 29/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
RHK (ASX) Chart |