Research Notes on GPP Guyana Morabisi Project, Coal to Liquids Project & SOP projects, page-13

Post #:20399210

@ftwind

I have found your posts regarding to "Coal to Liquids" technology project very valuable and important. Everyone needs to read it carefully IMO. I have now moved them here to the related thread because we have a lot of relevant information above. I am hoping you'd excuse me .

As you said below, these guys may have stumbled onto something big with this OHD technology (other  than lithium project)

You made me enlightened about how important the "Calcium uptake of the plants" which is provided by the OHD technology. Thank you.

You said "highly regarded Agronomist highlighting to me his opinion of underrated significance of calcium uptake and designing nutrients to maximise its uptake which ultimately helps further uptake of the rest so it looks like these guys may have stumbled onto something big here."

Then the OHD technology is on the money .

When I was making the research on Monash Uni. trial papers Monash University’s "Research into using OHD liquor as agricultural biostimulants" I realised that the result was better when 10 L/ha OHD applied than when 20 L/ha OHD applied (as it can bee seen on the graphic on my post above; STUDY 1 - TOMATOS, FLOWERS & FRUITS). But I couldn't understand the reason. Now I can understand it that 10L/ha maximized Calcium uptake, which ultimately is the real kicker as you said.

I am looking forward to the comments of your contacts next week (You said; "I have already texted an ex business associate, highly regarded Senior Nutrient Chemist selling nutrients globally, the details of GPP and will advise of his comments next week about his thoughts plus will contact another Agri consultant& nutrient chemist that distributes through Aus, Canada, US and UK early next week as well to see his opinion".)

Now your posts;

Post by @ftwind -  Post #:20393432 - Date:05/11/16   Time:12:42:53

The ASX casino never stops amazing me after all these years.

When prices are flying people jump hand over fist to get in and with some profit taking then they line up to get out and buyers slow/disappear.

Well I must be different accumulating 3 million shares on Friday with a much larger target so short sighted people please oblige me, take your profits and sell us your shares.
Special thanks to Donald TrumpJprofit takers I suppose.

As I see it if and when GPP secure distribution rights for other countries other than AUZ & NZ it is seriously game on. See, having experience in this field I was originally reluctant to load up at first, as I was very sceptical considering the minimal amount of information provided in the OHD trials other than significant results etc. With no trial details to compare results, but after watching the relentless buying interest I did some research of my own.

Thursday night I found the Fulvic-like product increased yield and decreased blossom end rot in tomatoes by Karen LITTLE^a*, William Roy JACKSON^a and Antonio PATTI^aschool of chemistry Mohash University document and after review I must say I am impressed to say the least.

http://thermaquatica.com/content/uploads/IHSS18-Little-Jackson-Patti.doc

Based on my interpretation of the results there is the very real possibility based on the evidence presented from the trial that 10L/ha could  be even further reduced to much less, given 20L/ha didn’t provide any extra benefit, as the 10L/ha maximized Ca uptake, which ultimately is the real kicker here. With further trials, IMO, one could surmise that this could lead to additional reduced costs beyond the one tenth of its competitor’s costs per hectare that was provided in the announcement by GPP.

Significant why, well for those that are not aware Ca uptake is the key here so let’s say 5L/ha or even less maximizes Ca uptake, then these guys are in serious business across the whole agricultural marketplace, IMO, and let’s say GPP then secure Australasian distribution rights, which makes sense to me, for fifteen years with an option for another 15 years, then even better.  

Whilst Calcium has always thought to be a secondary plant nutrient only potassium and Nitrogen are needed more and Calcium is essential to every part of a plant and as it is not very mobile in the soil, or in plant tissue, therefore needed in continuous supply so there is evidence that OHD bio stimulant nutrients has seemed to nail it by helping minimise leaching of other nutrients and maximising their uptake to overall increase yield/quality.

Essentially growth rates in plants are limited by their weakest link in the required chain, and for all but especially fast growing crops, Calcium is known to be paramount in improving drought/stress resistance, improving transpiration rates, water uptake, plants resistance to diseases as shown in the results and skin/cell/ fruit/bulb/root/soil quality and overall yield increases when made available/maintained at optimum levels without toxicity leading to improved uptake of other nutrients.

High Response Crops
While Ca is an essential element for all plants, the following crops have been found to be especially responsive.

apples, broccoli, brussel sprouts, cabbage, carrots, cauliflower, celery, cherries, citrus, conifers, cotton, curcurbits, melons, grapes, legumes, lettuce, peaches, peanuts, pears, peppers, potatoes, tobacco, and tomatoes.

http://www.spectrumanalytic.com/support/library/ff/Ca_Basics.htm

In respects to the lithium not enough information yet so let us see what BF produces with the next set of results, but for me now, I am here for the mentioned potential with the lithium being the desert, so to speak.

Although that photo that @Stockrocker provided of Blast holding that precious spodumene slab looks pretty promising. Looks like right place right time for Blast again….well done.
My rant/ramp for the day for all of you to ponder 17 million market cap too funny.


Post by @ftwind -  Post #:20394401  Date:05/11/16   Time:14:26:57
tritonboat said: ↑
Thanks for the heads up tritonboat i read a couple early on but like on I said on my previous post haven't read that much but will do now, so again thanks.

Been out of the game quite a few years now but still in occasional contact with some market players as I have some geothermal designs for the horticultural & Aquaculter/fish farming industry I have been working on for years that need huge capital investment and my attention of which I am reluctant to invest at this time with three you children under 8.

Until I found the Monash's trial results I was reluctant to believe the results but considering the mentioned I am 100%, green to go, with a dash of hesitance putting the house on it until extended distribution rights are clearer, patents are confirmed by me or extended etc.

I have already texted an ex business associate, highly regarded Senior Nutrient Chemist selling nutrients globally, the details of GPP and will advise of his comments next week about his thoughts plus will contact another Agri consultant& nutrient chemist that distributes through Aus, Canada, US and UK early next week as well to see his opinion.

I remember many moons ago the later very highly regarded Agronomist highlighting to me his opinion of underrated significance of calcium uptake and designing nutrients to maximise its uptake which ultimately helps further uptake of the rest so it looks like these guys may have stumbled onto something big here.

Can’t wait to see their thoughts but to me makes a lot of sense looking at the results and based on results I expect all future trials to see very similar results across the board.

In the field, IMO based on my experience, this will then potentially lead to reduced requirements of pesticides, herbicides and fungicides with the mentioned wholesalers hating these results as there is big money in these products for them but that’s an argument I will leave for another day.

Enjoy the weekend all of with the family to the river for a cruise enjoy Perth's beautiful weather

cheers