research reports and media, page-4320

After taking the time to actually listen to the interview, I've landed on the decision that this was a good idea by Paul.

I should have waited before posting, I normally do but the "dicky knees" comment from Alan years ago clearly really annoyed me. To make like of OA showed a real lack of research and understanding.

Alan attempted to ask all the questions to find holes and detract from the program, personally I found his approach somewhat non-professional, however Paul had the answers and was honest when he didn't.

To his credit, Paul owned the setbacks and ambiguity, but it allowed for all the "gans-like" crap to come out and get discussed in the open.

I think Paul did a great job dealing with Alan's interview technique and I stand corrected on it being a waste of Paul's time.

Transparency is key now, it is going to be down to the wire once we hear from the FDA and this exercise of honesty should go a long way to deflate the detractors arguments.
Although I feel my post is likely to wake at least a couple.

tick tock, I'm tipping it will be on like Donkey Kong in the next week or so.