why do you think its a PAR study? There are other manufacturers of PPS, and this study wont have to use PARs supplier. also, may be wrong but it aopears its targeting a different mechanism which doesnt infringe on the BMEL patents. smart.
why do you think its a PAR study? There are other manufacturers...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3,813 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add PAR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
23.0¢ |
Change
-0.020(8.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $80.45M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 25.0¢ | 25.0¢ | 23.0¢ | $235.8K | 980.7K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 100000 | 22.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 26.0¢ | 6521 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 05/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| PAR (ASX) Chart |