An interesting post that has the pattern of aggression and...

An interesting post that has the pattern of aggression and attempted intimidation and character assassination that does not warrant a response as it reflects more on your character than mine.

My posts stand alone as input for discussion and debate. My background gives myself the right to have an opinion on TV2U and OTT matters. I am happy with my life and career.

My shares were purchased and not gifted and I have not received a cent for any sort of services to TV2U as income, nor free shares or options, so you are distorted in your storytelling.

The only options I have received were those the company issued on a 1 to 4 basis to all shareholders back in 2016 as I recall.

I sold down my shares as I could see commercialisation was a long way off after the company listed and took advantage of the pump and dumps others orchestrated.

I have not purchased any TV2U shares of note since the listing but will do so again once I can see it is on the cusp of commercialisation. That point is likely to occur in the next quarter and revenue likely in the 3rd quarter IMO.

My point with Ooyala is simply it faiLed in part as it could not secure the quality of streaming under load. Telstra wrote it down off the books as it is now a legacy system and Telstra is now as we speak canvassing the industry to in-house build its own platform.

Anyone streaming live content in 3rd world environments has to architect their platforms to reduce the risk. A World Cup Event is a high concurrent hit rate event that will test any system under load and so its a technical topic well worth discussing.

As is typical of Production I,T, systems Telstra has an existing client base on the platform which it must continue to support until it can transition to whatever new platform it builds. So yes it is still live but it is a millstone around their neck and they must keep it live for that reason and hence it is written off on the accounts.

If you are into disclosure then reveal all about yourself if you think it OK and relevant but attacking the messenger as a tactic to attack the underlying message is a tactic that may satisfy you as a way of telling yourself that what I post has no currency or relevance.

Thats simply a form of denial. I put no one on hold on HC as I welcome all perspectives. I do reserve the right to ignore replying to posts that are simply baiting.

All IMO and GLTAH